SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Black Shoe Diaries

Meet the Coaches: Charles London

More please...  (Photo: Mike/BSD)

More please... (Photo: Mike/BSD)

The first reports of an assistant coach being named after Bill O'Brien surrounded Charles London, the 36-year old former quality control coach with the Tennessee Titans. London will coach the running backs at Penn State, a position he played at Duke before coaching them at Duke for a year in 2006. Again, a word of warning: be careful not to swap the first and last name when researching Charles London.

Playing Experience. Not too much to brag about, outside of a 51-yard scoring scamper against Florida State in 1995. He was recruited by Ted Roof to Duke and will reunite with Roof on the Penn State coaching staff, as Peter outlined earlier this week. London lettered in both football and track while at Duke, running in the 4x100 relay.

After school, London bounced around a couple of different sports related jobs before entering the coaching realm, including a stint with Disney's Wide World of Sports.

Star-divide

Coaching Experience. In 2004, London got his break at his alma mater, becoming a graduate assistant under head coach Ted Roof for two years at Duke before a one year assignment as running backs coach. In 2007, London was hired as a quality control assistant for the Chicago Bears. London spent a lot of his time in Chicago working with the wide receivers. There are some questions as to whether performance (or lack thereof) issues contributed to his departure from Chicago in 2010, but the Bears official position was that London was simply not renewed. Finally, London spent the last year as an offensive assistant/quality control coach with the Tennessee Titans. He received Titans head coach, and former Penn Stater, Mike Munchak's blessing before heading to State College.

Errata. There isn't much else known about London. He's a young, up-and-coming African-American coach who walks into a great, yet tenuous, spot at Penn State. He'll be the position coach for one of the better running backs we've seen in some time, but he'll also have a pretty shallow depth chart. Having spent more than a few years in a film room for both college and professional teams, London will be an asset in game prep for Coach O'Brien.

Outlook. Much like George Godsey, we're forced into a wait-and-see approach. London's career path is still much too short to make any real judgments. He has been around the block in the NFL and college, and has seen the growth of some pretty good running backs (Matt Forte, Chris Johnson). Hopefully he learned some valuable lessons and can coach Silas Redd to the next level (Note to self: purchase Silas4Heisman.com domain name).

Poll
Grade the Charles London hire:
A
103 votes
B
321 votes
C
345 votes
D
103 votes
F
43 votes

915 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  116 comments

Comments

more of the same

cautious optimism infused with strands of doubt.

I gave the hire the first A

Only time will tell. I really liked his background. Young, nice looking, good education. Still limited football experience, but I think you need a mixture of very experienced guys (LJ, Vandy), some middle experienced guys and some younger guys on a staff.

Beyond his football experience, I like he won several academic/athletic awards while at Duke and a best teammate award. I also like the fact, he has a few years of non-football experience. Working for Disney (unless he played the character Dopey!) can’t be all bad. Maybe that will give him some different credibility when recruiting as opposed to an all-football type guy. Don’t know. Kind of like professors. Those that never worked in business or industry never had as much credibility with me as those who worked outside academia for awhile.

If he is motivated, I just look at him as potentially a goood teacher and good recruiter. I liked that he was O’Briens first hire. We’ll have to wait and see.

according to the internet

and his Duke bio…..he was the Events Manager for Disney Wide World of Sports
:)

how can you give him an A?

He coached with Ted Roof, he cant possibly be good.

Nice looking?

How is that relevant?

Nobody wants a sideline full of uglos!
Based on what I'm seeing on google

I would disagree with the nice looking assessment. Unless that happens to be your particular fetish.

Well, he's certainly no John Butler

but, he has a nice smile and seems personable

but, yeah, the ears, not so much

And the tranny look and the badonkadonk

Or, do I have the wrong person?

I'm guessing

You probably googled “London Charles” instead of “Charles London.”

Gotta impress the recruit's momma.
Also (sneak preview for tomorrow's recruiting article)

London is the point man for one of our top remaining targets, NY RB Akeel Lynch. So there’s that.

If he helps to land Lynch...

…I’ll give him an “A+”, but an “F” is he doesn’t. ;-)

Yeah I heard

Lynch decommited from BC and is visiting this weekend. That would be an unexcepted surprise

Yup.

Lynch and a few others…stay tuned.

Please say happy things
I think you'll be happy with how this weekend unfolds.
maybe its because i'm new

but these teasers seem almost unfair. I feel like a kid at christmas, and I almost never follow the recruiting trail this closely.

Mr. Lomax disagrees

Apparently they are going after a top QB who is already committed to Clemson

Ben retweeted, but it was from the kid’s on tweet mentioning that PSU is coming after him and really wants him in SC.

Chad Kelly, Jim's nephew.

Committed to Clemson, but reportedly has a bit of an attitude. They’ve reached out to a number of QBs, which could be good (they’re looking for another QB) or bad (they’re looking to replace Skyler).

Are they going to make..

him a linebacker?

How does Skylar's...

dad’s potential new jobs influence his choice?

If his dad takes a job in Oakland, there is a chance Skyler will opt for a school closer to new home.

PSU is great now location-wise. But if his parents are 3000 miles away, suddenly it’s not so attractive.

Then he goes graveling back to Stanford and we start hoping for a McGloin Redux as our best option
I dont know how Oakland could be attractive. Ever.

Unless you like those whistle tips. Go WHOOO WHOOOOO!

Yikes....

so that means there could be no incoming QB in this class? Is there a realistic chance they bring anybody else in? I gotta think if they wait until signing day and Skyler doesn’t commit, that’s a huge huge hit for the team.

And they better be recruiting about 10 QB’s for next year and getting out early on it.

Everybody gets a C

Except for LJ, Vandy, and maybe the WR coach, since he’s shown he can produce talent. Otherwise, we have no clue as to what most of these assistant coaches can really do.

The Offensive Line Coach?
yes him too

I knew I was forgetting someone. And I’d give BoB a solid B at this point. B+ for keeping LJ and Vandy, B- for Roof.

Big knock against London...

is the performance of the RBs at Duke while he was their position coach. 2.9 yards per carry. That’s awful, no matter where you coach. I’m definitely hoping he’s improved since then.

Well, what kind of talent did they have at Duke during his tenure (not just at RB, but on the O-Line)?
Did Munchak give his blessing

for London to seek another job and look for a promotion or was it more of a recommendation. If it was more of a “he’ll do a fantastic job,” I’d be a little more comfortable with this one. Munchak has pretty much been the consumate Penn Stater and I find it hard to believe he’d recommend him if London were a poor performer.

I forget the exact wording,

but I remember Munchak being very praise-worthy of London, especially given where London was heading.

thanks

I know it’s a game of semantics. However, I’ve had employees come to me that I’ve given my blessing to seek other employment. Were they all superstars or solid performers? No. Rarely have I given out a personal recommendation in the same respect. In the grand scheme of things, however, it only makes us feel better. It changes nothing about his hire or his ability to perform the task at hand. On a lighter note, feeling better after your foray into New Orleans style debauchery?

Not back to 100% yet.

Three days in NOLA was bad enough, but I came home and immediately caught a cold, which I’m still battling. Been a rough week.

Recruiting might be a bonus with him,

but he is still a step down from Galen Hall in terms of coaching RB’s. Galen had quite a resume in terms of RB’s produced (Emmit Smith, LJ jr, Royster, Hunt, etc.)

As I alluded to above

I doubt he had Smith-level talent to work with at Duke.

He also had quite the resume in terms of apathy, disconnectedness and indifference.

Of course that is just personal opinion (and a bit of Internet snark), but of all of the coaches that are leaving, I was most happy to see Galen go. I have absolutely nothing to back this up with, but my gut feeling was that Galen checked out a long time ago and was just content with cashing a paycheck in a state of semi-retirement for the past couple of years.

I don't necessarily disagree

We certainly have an upgrade in terms of offensive coordinator, but I would argue Galen was probably more effective in his role of RB coach just in terms of experience in teaching fundamentals.

I would say the same

the areas that probably showed apathy were in in OC and recruiting roles. As a position coach, he seemed to get the most out of the talent that we had. And I dont think I ever once heard a RB say one bad thing about the guy.

BranDon Snow

had some nasty things to say on the way out, but it sounded like sour grapes from a guy who couldn’t stay out of trouble.

Specifically about Galen or the coaching staff as a whole?

and yeah, probably sour grapes.

Specifically about Galen

My memory on this is quite hazy, but I think he (and maybe his sister?) referred to Galen as a mean old man, or something to that effect. I think Snow was upset about not getting some playing time that he thought he deserved.

Well I was thinking more along the lines of him criticizing his coaching

In Snow’s defense though, Galen totally does look like the guy who gives out bags of pennies to kids on halloween.

Wasn't Snow the one that Levi Brown had to put in his place on the sideline during a game?
Galen Hall might be a lot of things

but a mean old man isn’t one of them.

I'd say that settles it :)
PSU's running backs were better before pre-Galen Hall,

as opposed to Galen Hall’s tenure.

IMO, we actually regressed in that area. Blair Thomas, Richie Anderson, KJ Carter, Mike Archie, Curtis Enis…I’ll take that group over Royster, Hunt, LJ any day of the week.

Where does Mike Gasparato fit into your analysis?
gasparato

watch you rip through defenses

Also, recent RB's showed development

(unlike a certain other critical offensive position)

Reply fail to sub thread above
Not to be a Debbie Downer

But as a Bears fan I can tell you he had very little to do with Matt Forte. Tim Spencer has been RB coach in Chicago since before this guy even became a coach. On the upside, he was let go by the Bears at the same time they cleaned house of Ron Turner and like 4 other offensive coaches. And he definitely wasnt let go cause he was a bad coach, just not one Mike Martz wanted. I mean Luke Butkus was the other QC Assistant, and he was let go. And a Butkus cannot be fired by the Bears… I believe it is a felony.

It just wait and see now

Joyner et al were afraid to bring in the Harvard coach, couldn’t get the NW coach, so they settled on the Duke Mafia. Personally I am not expecting very much from this group. They have very little experience at this level and quite frankly very little success. If the talent at Duke was subpar whose fault is that? Stanford seems to be able to deal with high academic standards and succeed at the highest levels of competition. I do not want to be the Duke of the B1G (EXCEPT IN BASKETBALL).

Stanford has been categorically awful in football for most of the last 100 years.

Please do not mistake Harboughs recent success as something Stanford does. They had something like 3 winning seasons since 94 before he showed up in 2008. Is it possible to win in a place like Stanford, Duke, NW or PSU? Sure.

But for consistency, there’s only one school that has done it nearly year in, year out.

You are correct

My point is that a high academic school can have a successful football program, but it requires top notch recruiting, The question is can the new staff recruit against MSU, MU, OSU & Wis. Their record say not.

Nick Saban couldn't outrecruit UM when he was at MSU

sometimes it has to do with the program resources and tradition that you’re given to work with.

I'm not trying to be a blind cheerleader for the new staff

But are you seriously estimating the new staff’s recruiting ability as PSU coaches solely based on the recruiting some them did as DUKE FOOTBALL coaches? That’s kind of like using the raw sales numbers from an iPod salesman at an Apple store and the same figures for a guy working at a Best Buy selling Zune players and concluding, “This Best Buy schmuck can’t sell an MP3 player to save his life! But this Apple guy, boy, he’s a sales genius.”

Actually, my analogy is not ridiculous enough. The difference between PSU football and Duke football is an order of magnitude greater than the difference between iPods and Zunes.

just ask Kyle

he can tell you all about zunes.

If nothing else, the fact that he graduated from Duke suggests he's smart and

gets the honor part of success with honor, if not the success part.

lawls!

Success with honor. Hold the success.

Young, smart, energetic with some experience.

I could be wrong, but it seems like RB coach is a good place to groom a young coach. There’s plenty to teach, but that’s a position that can rely on natural ability in many ways. I imagine he’s going to be a good recruiter if he’s as excited as people say he is.

Did he play Lacrosse?
He must have tons of friends in the Duke lacrosse program.

On the field, Duke lacrosse is ELITE. Ergo, London should poach lacrosse recruits for RBs! It’s bulletproof, after all did you know Evan Royster played lacrosse?

duke lacrosse is about as elite

as virgina tech football.

Ummm...

They won the men’s national title in 2010. Not elite or anything. Just made three final fours in the four years prior. And if you’re referring to the scandal, Mike Nifong served six months in prison and was disbarred for prosecutorial misconduct. Read Mike Pressler’s book on the subject. It actually has a lot of parallels to the PSU situation, especially given the trustees’ article in this morning’s NYT.

not talking about Nilfong

the program is far from elite at this point. In the last ten years or so its one of the top 5-8 programs, but this is relatively new ground for them. Im not saying they are bad, im saying that elite, at this stage, is a stretch. before 2005 they were in 1 final four. they went 50+ years between ACC titles. They can get there, but 5 years of recent success does not make you elite

Nothing against them as a program or in the last 5-10 years, but dont confuse them with Syracuse or JohnsHopkins or Princeton or Maryland just yet.

Hence my use of the all caps ELITE.

I thought that was understood sarcasm, in fact it’s used to make fun of VT. Sorry.

Duke Lacrosse is ELITE.

Better?

I was going to make a similar point about the Duke media/school/prosecution miscarriage of justice

and how it has some analogies to the PSU situation. But you beat me to it.

To get back at you, I will literally demonstrate on TV (Nancy Grace of course) to the public the exact choke hold you used on your victim, knowing full well that a bank surveillance camera recorded you at an ATM at the same time as the alleged crime, affirmatively exonerating you.

Nancy Grace is my fantasy.

I fantasize about firing her dumb ass, blacklisting her from ever showing her face on TV again, and tying her to a chair and making her watch twenty straight hours of Nifong’s trial testimony. And then firing her dumb ass again, just to be a prick about it.

This is a meme on this site.

One guy once said we weren’t as elite in football as Virginia Tech, so now we say that VA Tech is the epitome of elite. They weren’t referring to the Duke lacrosse scandal.

something something Evan Royster something something
I like his attitude

(as displayed in the “meet the coaches” video on gopsu) – He seems like a good salesman – which is basically what a recruiter is

plus, I’ll bet his meetings will have the BEST snacks and sandwiches

Should know alot about lowering the center of gravity

That London Charles has what appears to be a very solid low center of gravity.

Told you.
please

BMan didnt “accidentally” search that

always considered myself a butt man but that was a butt.

So THAT'S what your screen name means.
I'm not sure what to think

The WRs in Chicago and Tennessee are terrible (quick, name 1 Titans WR…I love the NFL and couldn’t do it), but is that a product of crap talent or crap teaching of London’s? He’s definitely a positive on the recruiting front though, being a young, smart, relatable black man, so I’m glad to see that.

he didnt coach WRs in Chicago

Darryl Drake did, and still does. From what I recall, QC assistants in the NFL work on a year to year basis, and i think he just wasnt renewed when Mike Martz came to town. So in summary, I dont know what to expect. I do know that, according to wikipedia which i thankfully back up and running, his best season at Duke as a RB garnered him 290 yards rushing. So theres that.

Nate Washington

Come on dude, I don’t watch a lot of NFL, but anyone who sucks at plays fantasy football ends up playing The Most Dangerous Game by mid season (a.k.a. picking up one of the Titans reject receivers because he happened to catch two TDs in one game)

He's not coaching the WRs here soooooooo

I dont get it.

I'm well aware he's not coaching WRs here

I’m just looking at his previous track record, that’s all.

C

My logic puts somebody we don’t really know much about, good or bad, at a C, if they’re in a low-level position at least (I wouldn’t accept that in a more major role).

I dont know if it has been said

but FOS has an interview with BOB about recruiting, and in it BOB says that Charles London will be the recruiting coordinator

I guess it depends on what he actually does

but if its the same thing as MM was doing, I would have really preferred LJ in that role. Sit down with him one-on-one and I dont know how you could say no. London is a bit too unknown for my liking.

MM was more of an overseer, though.

If LJ becomes RC, he’d likely have to cut back on his actual field time, and that’s just wrong.

once again

i expect there will be some great sandwiches – and maybe a cheese plate.

Or you can google London Charles if you're bored
I've been told our new running backs coach has quite the ass.

I’ve also heard something about an up and coming lacrosse player, Evan something?

Duke

What’s with the fascination with ex-Duke coaches?

They bang ex-Duchesses.

Duchessi? Duchessen?

What’s they proper plural here?

duh

they went 1-22 in 2 years.

Duke

Penn ST hiring ex-Duke football coaches is like Duke hiring Ed Dechellis and his staff.

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Black Shoe Diaries to post a comment.