Patrick Smith - Getty Images
Dolla Billz Oliver has given up his playing career because of his head issues. (Photo by Patrick Smith/Getty Images)
This was inevitable, but it doesn't make it any less sad. Once it was reported Oliver got sick during the Minnesota game and his concussion symptoms had returned, it only seemed like a matter of time before Dolla Billz hung em up. I honestly was surprised he came back the last two games against MSU and Iowa, but Billy made it official after the Nebraska game yesterday.
I'm sure there are plenty of fans who are probably excited about this news for all the wrong reasons. They probably think this frees up a scholarship for Chambers to use to build for the future even though it really doesn't. They also are probably happy that the 'worst basketball player ever' (yes, I heard this statement while in the student section yesterday) will no longer don the Blue and White.
These narrow-minded individuals are the fans who believe scoring points is the sole indicator of basketball ability. Yes, Billy Oliver struggled in this capacity for Penn State. Despite being a great shooter in high school and having picture-perfect form, he will leave with just 45 threes at 30.9% clip in 58 games. There's no doubt his woes were frustrating for everyone, especially since his jumper was essentially his only offensive weapon.

Hopefully many others will remember and appreciate Dolla Billz as the ultimate, selfless teammate. The man who was always making the right rotations on defense and took the most charges. The man who drew praise and admiration from two coaching regimes and more talented players. He is a perfect representative as a Penn State student-athlete, and you can clearly see the impact he had in the lockerroom after hearing the reaction from his teammates and coach.
It's a shame we were never able to see a free-minded Billy Oliver. Only he can tell you how much of a hindrance his concussion history has had on his college career, but there's no doubt it had some effect. I've seen Jamelle Cornley look me in the eye and say Billy Oliver was going to be a player. So has basically everyone involved with the program since Billy joined in the fall of 2008. Unfortunately, we were left with more moments like these instead of this.
Undoubtedly this is the right decision for Billy's health, but you hate to see a hard-working kid get the short end of the stick. He's had to deal with these issues his entire career without getting answers from any doctors. It seemed like just when he thought he was over it, the headaches came back to haunt him. He kept trying to overcome the obstacle and contribute to the program as its captain, but in true Oliver fashion, he selflessly retired because he's not able to give 100%, and that's unfair to his teammates.
Billy will get a medical scholarship for next year and stick around in a graduate-assistant type role. He'll be able to finish his two degrees in Finance and Economics, while helping out any way he can.
We wish Billy well in his future endeavors and thank him for his relentless effort. He will be missed. Contrary to an all-too-popular opinion, he was far from worthless in this program.
Now the scholarship situation has changed yet again. Here's the updated table:
This doesn't open a 2013 scholarship, so it doesn't allow Chambers to recruit another high schooler. It only offers a one-year scholarship opening for next season. This will likely be offered to Nick Colella, who likely has earned it in Chambers' eyes. Colella is in his 4th year, but redshirted last season, so he has one year of eligibility remaining. I didn't think he would return if he had to pay, but this significantly increases the chances he'll be on the roster next season. Chambers could also explore graduate-transfers, who could also fill one year scholarships and not have to sit out a year. With Colella's contributions this season, I just don't think Chambers will feel the need to entertain that option unless he already has a connection to a potential transfer.
1 recs | 30 comments
Good luck, Billy.
Glad you’ll still be helping the team.
CvilleLion - February 12, 2012
I must confess
I was one of those that fans that doubted Billy’s contribution, but that was last year. DeChellis’ bench got so little production, Sasa, Marshall, Woodyard and Oliver, I suspected them all of being recruiting busts. The NIT run spoiled me, especially after seeing players who could come in and contribute right away, Battle, Pringle, Frazier.
But even Jeff Brooks didn’t bloom until his senior year though, so there’s always hope and room for growth. I remember early in the season watching Billy toss up one brick after another, and seeming to always foul out. They said he could shoot lights out in practice. Then came Purdue, and we witnessed what this kid can really do. And that’s it, done finished. Guess we’ll never know now, but for the sake of his health and future, we can all live with that.
TonyLion - February 12, 2012
Head injuries are tough...sometimes you never recover fully
SweepTheLeg - February 12, 2012
I am all for Colella keeping his scholarship...
As long as he never sees the floor next season. For a shooter, the guy cannot shoot. I am sure he is a good teammate and all, but he flat out stinks. Hopefully we get Jeter and along with Newbill, they take all his minutes. I’d like to see a winning season next year.
btress - February 12, 2012
Unbelievable.
This is the exact same narrow-minded thinking I criticized in this post. Nick had a terrible shooting game yesterday, no doubt. But one game does not label him as a guy who cannot shoot, especially when he’s been THE ONLY ONE who has shown any capability of making a jumper on the road. He made 10 of his last 24 threes in his last 5 games, which happened to be the toughest part of the schedule. That is a more than respectable 42% clip.
Is he someone who’s going to take us to the next level? No, but you’re completely discrediting his welcomed contributions this season. Oh, and he busts his balls on defense, which is why he’s even playing in the first place if you’ve ever listened to Chambers this season.
Eric Gibson - February 12, 2012
Boom
lion09 - February 12, 2012
i like colella
more then billy oliver, i know billy hustled as much as humanly possible, but being on the floor for these game u could always hear chambers yelling about billy not knowing the offensive plays that were being run. both give out great effort, if we get jeter then im happy but im just as content with collela giving in his hustle minutes that help keep teh whole team energized…hes also not that bad considering he played at a branch campus before moving up to happy valley
ktd5048 - February 12, 2012
Truly Unbelievable
I’m not sure how you can call a fact narrow-minded thinking. Colella is shooting 28% from the field on the season! To put that in perspective that is 7% less than the worst team in college basketball and 2nd worst individual percentage on Penn St, the 332nd ranked shooting team in the nation.
You mention his last 5 games, but you fail to include his most recent 2-12 shooting performance in that statistic. It’s simply not fair to take a 5 game sample size, which include his 2 best games, and call it proof that he can shoot.
Look, I am sure he is a good teammate, great guy, works hard, etc, etc. Fact is though, he is a minimal athlete that shoots 28%. You can like him for his effort all you want, but you have to realize he doesn’t belong on a B10 basketball team as anything more than the 11th or 12th man.
btress - February 12, 2012
You're only looking at one side of the ball
Colella is 4th on the team in both block% and steal%. The only other guy who can say that he’s in the top 4 on the team in both is Jermaine Marshall, and Marshall commits 1.1 more fouls per 40 minutes doing it. Penn State is currently ranked 84th in defensive efficiency. Not awesome, but well above average, especially given how good the competition has been this year.
Bottom line, Colella is one of, if not the, best one-on-one defenders a very good defensive team.
ckmneon - February 12, 2012
My initial assertion was that Colella cannot shoot.
That was attacked as narrow-minded, so I defended that point with valid statistics related to offense and shooting.
Now if we want to get into defense, so be it. Are you telling me that Colella is one of the best defenders on the team because he has managed to average half a steal and a fifth of a block a game in his limited minutes? I ask because that is all those stats really get at. They don’t give any insight into whether or not Colella can actually guard anyone.
Fact is his defense would need to be quite exceptional to overcome his atrocious shooting percentage.
btress - February 12, 2012
Per minute has nothing to do with it
Block% and Steal% are the % of defensive possessions in which a player will get one of those things. Colella gets a block on 1.6% of the defensive possessions he’s in and a steal on 2.0% of the defensive possessions he’s in the game for. Both are 4th best on the team, and only Jermaine Marshall, who fouls much more frequently than Colella, can say he’s with Colella as being in the top 5 in both categories.
As for his atrocious shooting percentage, I don’t disagree. 28% is bad. But that’s just one number that doesn’t pay attention to his minutes in the game. That’s why it’s narrow minded: it’s just one bulk number that pays no attention to other factors.
It’s more reasonable just to include stats from games where he’s played at least 15 minutes. If a guy doesn’t get those minutes, especially a shooter, it’s tough for him to get comfortable. In games where he’s actually played over 15 minutes (which he didn’t do for the first 15 games and 17 of the first 20), he’s shooting 32% and averaging 1 point per shot. Neither are awesome and I won’t pretend that they are, but they’re certainly both more attractive and meaningful than just seeing 28%, calling it bad, and walking away.
Part of Colella’s problem just seems to be Nebraska. Against teams not named Nebraska in which he’s played at least 15 minutes, he’s shooting 41% and averaging 1.3 points per shot. That’s pretty darned good.
ckmneon - February 12, 2012
Possessions played are a function of minutes played.
So yes they do have something to do with it. In limited minutes (and therefore limited possessions) he averages however many steals and blocks. My point is that those statistics do not give much insight into whether or not Nick is actually a quality defender. In fact the two stats you gave me only tell me about 3.6% of his defensive possessions. What about the other 96%?
It will be tough for either one of us to argue Colella’s defensive ability because there are not many advanced defensive metrics available for college basketball (at least that I can find). Steals and blocks do not tell the whole story. I’d rather know what percentage the guy Collela guards shoots.
Colella stinks. It is flat out the truth. I do not care how many minutes a guy plays, shooting 28% is right up there with the worst offensive players throughout college basketball. Sure we can massage his stats until they give us decent numbers to look at, but that is more narrow-minded than taking the stats as a whole and evaluating them.
I don’t hate the guy. He is useful in the rebuild, because he provides effort every single night. That’s all he is though, a high effort player. Let’s stop kidding ourselves and act like we have to think every player on Penn St. is solid. We are the worst team in the B10 for goodness sake. We have some bad players. It’s the nature of the beast. Can’t we be objective and still fans?
btress - February 12, 2012
You keep parroting this "28%" number
28% is a fact and is not subject to debate. It’s not very good. It also doesn’t come close to telling the whole story.
Wanna know what other not subject to debate facts exist about Colella’s numbers? 1.0 points per FGA in games where he’s played at least 15 minutes. 1.3 points per FGA in games where he’s played at least 15 minutes against teams not named Nebraska. Top four on the team in both Block% and steal%, all while averaging a very modest 3.1 fouls per 40 minutes.
What’s more reasonable: looking at the numbers in games where the guy actually played a significant, meaningful role, or looking at numbers that include games like Kentucky and Mt. St. Mary’s, where Colella played less than 10 minutes in games that were far out of reach?
You can call it massaging the numbers. I call it doing a little research and looking at more than just one stat while intentionally blinding myself to the others that don’t fit my preconceived notion of the truth.
The question isn’t whether we can be objective and still fans. The question is whether you can be objective period.
ckmneon - February 12, 2012
This has all been very interesting
the “money ball” movement in basketball over the past few years has been very interesting (to me).
But for those of us who have played the game, there’s a saying that needs to be brought into this statistical argument:
BALL DON’T LIE.
Stats over a short period of time extrapolated to an entire game are a fun exercise. But they’re just that – an exercise. You can either play or you can’t.
Tailgate Shogun - February 12, 2012
So what's your take?
Can he play?
btress - February 13, 2012
Your assertion was Colella flat out sucks.
As you’ve stated multiple times. That implies he’s an all-around terrible basketball player who doesn’t deserve to be playing right now. Somehow, though, the coach everyone is raving about has actually started him the last two games. He played 32 minutes against Neb and 37 against MSU. Chambers raves about his defense and work ethic and says he’s earned every minute he’s gotten this year.
We can pick and choose the numbers however we want. You can stick to his season total, and I’ll stick to his conference play. Or we could use CK’s MPG mark. It just blows my mind that you can just completely dismiss the dramatic growth his role has seen over this season. Three months ago, he wasn’t even in the rotation. He got off to a 1-10 start from 3 in the non-conference schedule, because he would take one shot and miss it in the first half or in garbage time. It was meaningless minutes! Now, he’s a regular contributor against some of the best teams in the country, but apparently all of that is a level playing field to you.
Colella was a respectable 37.5% 3-point shooter in Big Ten play until his slump in the Nebraska game (now he’s a 32.6% shooter). He had a bad game shooting the ball yesterday and should’ve been more selective in his shots. But who cares, let’s get rid of him for it.
Eric Gibson - February 12, 2012
Tough deal for Billy.
Seems like a good guy, seems well-liked by his teammates. Hate to see someone’s career end like this, but he has a whole life to think about. And like I said in one of the earlier threads, he’ll always have the memory of his magical Purdue game.
Chris Grovich - February 12, 2012
i dont understand
how medical scholorships work, can someone explain why it opens a scholorship up for the team but only for 2012, y couldn’t we store it and use it on 2013 kid?
ktd5048 - February 12, 2012
I don't know the detailed rules.
I’d imagine it goes something like this – if a scholarship athlete’s career is cut short due to injury or a medical condition, the NCAA will honor their scholarship for the athlete to get his degree. If I had to guess, I’d imagine they would give him a scholarship for the rest of his would be athletic eligibility. The medical scholarship does not count towards PSU’s allotted 13 basketball scholarships, since he can’t play.
Eric Gibson - February 12, 2012
would that mean
someone transferring in wouldn’t need to sit out a year? so if a transfer from saint johns would be able to just step right away and not have to sit out like newbill
ktd5048 - February 12, 2012
transfers' sitting out a year doesn't have to do with scholarship availability most of the time
it has to do with NCAA transfer guidelines first and foremost. Even if there were scholarships available, most players have to sit a year if they transfer within D1 unless they’ve already graduated (and there are other stipulations as well)
Cari Greene - February 12, 2012
Sorry to hear this about Billy
Tough break for him, but sounds like there’s a lot more to his life than basketball. Wish him the best.
Also, the Altoona Mirror has the best headline about the game yesterday. “Lady Lions have fun in win over Nebraska.” Yep, that’s the headline for their game recap found here:
http://www.altoonamirror.com/page/content.detail/id/558121/Lady-Lions-have-fun-in-win-over-Nebraska.html?nav=5017
psfann - February 12, 2012
Wow.
Eric Gibson - February 12, 2012
Thanks for your time Billy.
I hope you can get healthy and good luck out there man.
lion09 - February 12, 2012
Thank you for all of your effort and sacrifice, Mr. Oliver
Keep making Penn State proud
ckmneon - February 12, 2012
Tough break
Billy always played his ass off
coop_sauce - February 12, 2012
That sucks.
I always liked Oliver and thought he gave quality minutes on defense.
Joe 96alum - February 12, 2012
Best wishes on all future endeavors
Smart call to think about your future health; can’t imagine how hard it must be to walk away from what you love.
Tailgate Shogun - February 12, 2012
"Worst basketball player ever"??
Sorry, when I was at PSU (let’s call it the turn of the century), there were better candidates for that title.
Although it doesn’t matter at all, after a crap loss at Wisconsin, he was the only one that turned to the visitors section behind the bench and clapped back at us. I liked him for that.
BurrowesBldg - February 13, 2012
HA for sure
Who was the guy that used to come in to spell Amechi? he’d have 5 or 6 mins a game and consistently fouled out pretty much every night
mbailey71 - February 13, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Black Shoe Diaries to post a comment.