I feel like I've seen a post here or there about changes coming to PSU's football program, but that I don't have a real grasp on the pulse of what folks around here really think. Frankly, I was surprised by how hateful some of the comments in articles about the topic really were (I know, I should not be surprised by comment sections).
When I'm talking about change I don't really mean changes to the offense/defense because those were obviously going to happen and always happen when anyone from a staff cycles into a new role.
What I'm talking about are the seemingly "minor" rule changes and philosophies. Anyone who knows PSU is aware that we (generally) hold tradition in high regard. That tradition has usually involved a hard-working, clean-cut, well-spoken image for our players that tried to emphasize the student in student-athlete. That said, we also hold winning in high regard and some people have thought we could be doing a lot more of that if we were a little more relaxed, open, and (for lack of better words) fun/exciting.
I'd like BSD's thoughts...
Some articles focused on this.
http://blog.pennlive.com/pasports/2012/02/penn_state_head_football_coach.html
http://www.mcall.com/sports/college/psu/mc-penn-state-football-0202-20120202,0,5192208.story

My take is a mix of "Oh my God they are changing everything I love about PSU!!!1!!11!" and "Who cares as long as the big things don't change?"
A little story that I think relates. I went home to THON this last weekend and stayed at my fraternity. There were no less than 20 alums also staying who ranged in age from just graduated to mid-30's. We got to talking about why more people don't stay engaged in the house after college and a recent grad said, "I'll probably stop coming here once everyone in the house graduates that I went to school with... it has changed so much just since I've left." I certainly see what he is saying. The music has "changed", they hang out in different parts of the house, some of them would rather bar hop on a Friday than hang out with the rest of the house who can't go out, and facebook has made their parties grow in size to the point where I'm not really sure why they even bother hosting/paying for so many people they'll probably never see again (our parties were always very small and I could actually meet everyone there and remember them the next weekend). On the other hand, everything I loved about the house is still generally intact (e.g., shared interests with many, many, many people that make it easy to become fast friends).
And then I sat in a board meeting with some of the much older guys from the house (guys coming back who were class of '61 and such) who seem very much out of touch with the reality of the current college student. When they went, the college student was the cream of the crop in terms of having their crap together and (often) having wealthy parents. Accordingly, the rules were strict, the alumni very demanding, and the students were adjusted to that. Fast forward and apply those same rules to 2012 and we wouldn't have anyone in the house, but they always suggest implementing rules that simply won't work in the current culture.
I have noticed that certain rules that were around in my time just simply don't apply any longer. But I've also noticed that these students are doing more philanthropy (their THON total was, embarrassingly to me, at least 8x higher than what we raised 8 years earlier), are more heavily involved in on-campus clubs, seem to drink less (outside of parties), and are holding down higher GPA's than the house I was in did. So, do those strict rules matter? Do they, at this point, just keep out smart and motivated kids who would rather spend their time worrying about things that matter?
As long as the changes in football (and in my fraternity) don't tread on an emphasis on teamwork and school work, I don't really care at all about changes. I think it fits the reality of the current disposition of college-aged kids, and I think changing some of these little things might just land us a recruit/pledge or two that thought the rules were a bit draconian before but that still had the academics and team spirit that we value.
Let's be honest, PSU players had their fair share of issues with the authorities in the past, so it isn't like a focus on the "little things" led to players always behaving like saints.
I think/hope that BOB's relaxing of certain rules will allow him more time to focus on the big things that are really important to most PSU alums. And as long as he doesn't change those things, I think he really deserves a long leash on making this program his own.
Aww, look at you. You created a Fanpost! Any content from a premium site that requires a subscription will be deleted once we catch wind of it. If you simply want to share a link, quote, or video, please consider using Fanshots instead. Thanks.
0 recs | 277 comments
"I thought some things needed to change and I'd be fine if he changed some other things."
I think BOB’s pushing the right buttons so far. There was a need to drag the program out of the Stone Age with respect to media accessibility and marketing. I don’t care if the players have long hair, beards, etc. I mean, seriously, most of them were covered in ink already. Give me a dreadlocked, tattooed, bearded kid who does well in the classroom and on the field. Joe taught a lot of people to look past color, now it’s time for a lot of others to look past dumb stuff like hair length and beards.
(Incidentally, I think it’s a tiny minority of people who really care about this clean-cut requirement going away.)
Chris Grovich - February 22, 2012
agree with everything you say.
You can still be disciplined and have long hair, beard, etc. This from someone who got 2 promotions in 05-06 time frame after cutting off his pony tail that he had since the late 80’s. Still makes me laugh that me with short hair is any different than me with long hair.
BMAN13 - February 22, 2012
Reminds me of these lyrics....
from the 1970’s song by Five Man Electrical Band (Many of you guys won’t have any idea who they were)
That was a great song from
PaJoe - February 22, 2012
from:-(
PaJoe - February 22, 2012
Good song
It’s in my current playlist rotation, just listened to it yesterday.
PSUGuru - February 22, 2012
5 Man Electrical Band
aurabass - February 23, 2012
That song used to be part of my playlist. Haven't played it since I got my hair cut
Same as David Crosby’s Almost Cut My Hair.
I have thought about bringing both back into the playlist, just because I was there once and know.
BMAN13 - February 23, 2012
What about
Long Haired Country Boy for some country flavor?
jman07 - February 23, 2012
I have played that, but you really need a band
the verse is one chord with an occasional 7th thrown in. Pretty hard to pull off alone on accoustic guitar unless you are a masterful finger picker, and I am not.
BMAN13 - February 23, 2012
than and I met Charlie Daniels years ago and he is absolutely the nicest professional muscian out there.
He is truly a good person. I still feel I could show up at his place and say I met him 25 years ago and he invited me, and he would welcome me in, no problem. The guy is amazing.
BMAN13 - February 23, 2012
But does he play a mean fiddle?
jman07 - February 23, 2012
met him as well and had the same impression.
That guy is just one cool cat.
smh244 - February 24, 2012
I thought that was a Tesla song.
(just kidding)
icavalera - February 22, 2012
Fun
I heard Tesla cover that in Rec Hall.
cs93 - February 22, 2012
Me too...
with Firehouse. Forgot about that show.
rahpsu92 - February 23, 2012
I think a lot of people have
1986 Fiesta Bowl PSU vs. Miami in mind when they are clingy to image. “OMG is PSU allows hats and facial hair the team is going to turn into a bunch on hedonistic jungle animals.”
I do like to see our guys in suits for travel (but a suit pairs surprisingly well with dreads).
rahpsu92 - February 22, 2012
That's a really good point about the Fiesta Bowl
It’s like PSU has had to live up to that image ever since.
Chris Grovich - February 22, 2012
Miami too.
jesse. - February 22, 2012
In their defense
up until the last few years, they did a wonderful job of it.
jman07 - February 22, 2012
so did we
spakajewia - February 23, 2012
That was the image
before then, too. It’s just that there wasn’t such a contrast in 1982, and in 1979 and 1985, well, we lost.
M1EK - February 22, 2012
It was the image for all champions back then.
The PSU team that beat Georgia was the first national champion to throw for more yards than it ran for. Innovation!!
BMAN13 - February 23, 2012
I'd be more than a little dissapointed if the suit requirement went away
My high school wrestling coach made us wear shirt and ties to away matches. If you didn’t wear them, you didn’t travel- didn’t matter who you were. It was annoying to a bunch of 14-18 year olds, but looking back on it, I’m glad he had the rule.
psuphysicist - February 22, 2012
I did like that too
Same with basketball in high school. When we had away games, we were in shirts and ties.
jman07 - February 22, 2012
many coaches today do this because Joe did
which I love
letsgopsu - February 22, 2012
I'm ok with beards to a point, but I'm not ok with long hair
The greater issue really is putting professional looking players out in front of the camera. I don’t care how smart, articulate, or generally well spoken a person is- the way they look will make both a first impression and a lasting one. Facial hair is fine so long as it is well groomed. The minute neckbeards and stringy AJ Hawk hair start coming out is the minute that PSU players lose respect of those that are non-football fans.
Playing for PSU is a priviledge that comes with some big responsibilities. They are ambassadors for our university, right or wrong, and in many cases, the face of the university. As such, they need to be not only well spoke, articulate and smart, but they also need to look the part. Football programs will always have a target on their back for folks who don’t understand the value that sports bring to an institution. They don’t need any extra ammunition
psuphysicist - February 22, 2012
Yeehaw
Underscored, emphasized, written twice.
Smee - February 22, 2012
That wasn't the best sentence I've ever written
but I think the point stands
psuphysicist - February 22, 2012
I agree with your first paragraph
I love Brett Keisel as a player, but not sure I want that as a Penn State image
PaJoe - February 22, 2012
Meh, long hair doesn't bother me so much.
As long as the other qualities you mentioned are generally there (smart, articulate, etc), I’m ok. Let them have their long hair and beards while they’re in college. For most of them, it’s their last chance to express themselves in that manner, as their next stop is the real world and a real job.
icavalera - February 22, 2012
The Jon Ritchie kid from Cumberland Valley reminds me of this
He had very long hair in high school and at Stanford but was a fabulous student and even played in the band at halftime, in uniform, for his high school.
BMAN13 - February 23, 2012
Don't forget Nobility!
Brandon Noble
reedjohnmiller - February 23, 2012
that's what I voted
thanks for typing it all the way out Chris
I’m too busy
trying to find clean clothes to wearironing my shirt ,rubber banding my goateetrimming my hair, andchugging beersdrinking earl grey tea to type all that.#KEEPINGUPTHEIMAGEFUHEVAH
hbeach08 - February 22, 2012
I'm laughing at the image of you rubber banding a giant goatee
Like you’re Jim “The Anvil” Neidhart or something.
Chris Grovich - February 22, 2012
(Really, Captain Lou. I don't think The Anvil rubber-banded.)
Chris Grovich - February 22, 2012
BTW, hbeach,
your nose hairs could use a trim as well . . . . Either that, or remove those two Brillo pads stuffed up your nostrils.
J/K, man!
PSU_Lions_84 - February 22, 2012
noted
hbeach08 - February 22, 2012
I'm 5'6"
so have a different point-of-view than you big guys.
PSU_Lions_84 - February 22, 2012
What about Leapin' Lanny Poffo?
icavalera - February 22, 2012
I now picture hbeach as Dionysus being fed his south american fruit by beautiful women
long hair and beard, guzzling wine from large ewer.
BMAN13 - February 23, 2012
Shades of Dionysus!
PSU_Lions_84 - February 23, 2012
Count me as someone who really cares about the clean-cut image
I think it is important to appear professional and put together from the ball boys all the way through the head coach. It worked here for years and it became fabric of our program. But at the same time I get it if BOB wants change so be it, I will still watch the team. However now I will have more to bitch about than the play calling.
carolinaeasy - February 22, 2012
I will cite cause-and-effect if play suffers
because the grooming standards have gone to Hades.
/Off to buy firewood and pitchfork.
PSU_Lions_84 - February 22, 2012
Yes, remember when Tamba had dreadlocks in HS.
Joe didn’t force him to cut his hair – he cut it because it’s part of the tradition. That’s what I like.
GoodOleDays - February 22, 2012
I'm alright so far
Allowing longer hair and facial hair is pretty minor. Mixing up S&C was a good thing, IMO. And making the program more accessible is refreshing, so long as it doesn’t get to USC levels of looseness.
So right now, put me in the “just right” category.
06Lion - February 22, 2012
Some changes are good.
I expect to see changes to our defense and offense. I understand there me a period of “meh” type of play unitl the staff is able to recruit players to fit the new system.
What I don’t want to see is for the staff to toss all the moral values out the window to win. I would hope that they continue to prepare these men for the future that awaits them when football is over.
I want our players to be respected as men. I want them in suits for travel during away games. I understand that this is a different era and values have changed. I am willing to except these minor changes with longer hair and etc.
The one I never want to see change are the uni’s.
PSUncle1981 - February 22, 2012
me = may
sorry about that
PSUncle1981 - February 22, 2012
Your first paragraph describes Michigan fans in 2008.
Your second paragraph describes Michigan fans in 2009.
The little things matter, for sure. But as long as the core values remain, I think fans will be able to live with dreadlocks and heavy metal music.
Jeff Junstrom - February 22, 2012
Yup, I've got nothing wrong with the changes so far.
New S&C program, including a gutted weight room with state of the art equipment in the largest single-sport weightroom in the country? Check.
Allowing the players to look and dress how they want, with minor (still acceptable) limitations? Check.
Jeff Junstrom - February 22, 2012
Yea. I'm cool with the changes
Let the guys be guys. I mean, i don’t really want to see a Kiesel beard or hair out of the helmet but I’m not going to lose my shit over it if it happens. Keep the guys in class, out of trouble, and win a couple of games and I’m good.
Do not touch the unis though. Do that, and I’ll have your head.
jman07 - February 22, 2012
^ This!
PSU_Lions_84 - February 22, 2012
We fear change.
WorldBFat - February 22, 2012
You're throwing rocks tonight.
Rec!
Jeff Junstrom - February 22, 2012
Changes so far are fine by me.
More importantly, the changes so far seem to have excited the returning players.
CvilleLion - February 22, 2012
This is the biggest reason I'm kind of feeling pretty comfortable...
If the players are excited (and still working hard), that’s going to rub off on new recruits and on turning in a better product on the field. It’s certainly easier to go from more strict to less strict in that regard.
Plus, I think it’s possible some of the players had the same feelings some of the fans did… that our talent was being underutilized in certain areas. Any time you feel that way, change is great.
BNittsDeMilo - February 22, 2012
Change I would like to see
If Tim Curley retires after his portion of “it” concludes, I would like to see Joe Battista given the Athletic Director job. I think he would be a great balance between old and new, what’s important and what’s not, and a focus on excellence with a need for winning performance. He’s done it as a player, has done it as a coach, has done it as an administrator. He’s old enough to know better and young enough to have the passion. I think he would be a great help to BOB.
Smee - February 22, 2012
Dave Joyner isn't going anywhere
Within a month of Curley’s resolution, they make Joyner permanent.
WFY - February 22, 2012
As much as I like Dave
I think JoeBa is an opportunity to change a bit differently — and better. Some of Dave’s decisions so far have not been good.
Smee - February 22, 2012
I pray every night that you are wrong!
belbijou - February 23, 2012
I'm afraid...
that next season when Moo Moo breaks off a big run or Mauti decapitates a running back five yards behind the line on third down, that I’m not going to care – at least not as much.
I need time to see if things are too different.
leeharvey418 - February 22, 2012
God football season needs to get here again...
BNittsDeMilo - February 22, 2012
Remember "They Call Me Assassin"
about Jack Tatum.
There was a part in there where he dreamed he hit someone so hard that the guys helmet flies off …. with his head in it!
Loved that line!
PaJoe - February 22, 2012
"It's only funny until someone loses an eye --
then it’s hysterical!"
PSU_Lions_84 - February 22, 2012
I don't think it's the changes themselves that everyone's afraid of.
It’s the effect those changes are going to have. Anything that can be seen as a threat to our ideals is going to scare a lot of people. Whether that fear is founded in reality or is irrational is a different discussion. I really don’t care what they do as long as our players continue to do well academically and athletically and we continue to do things the right way. Whether things are done the right way with long hair or facial hair is irrelevant to me. I do want to avoid anything over the top though. The only thing that I don’t want to see change besides the uniforms is the type of players we get. I want players we can be proud of for their accomplishments off the football field as well as on it. If the quality and character of our players don’t change, I will have no problems.
Succss With Honor Always - February 22, 2012
Good point about the quality and character of our players.
The only thing is, I don’t think Joe ever really didn’t recruit a player who might be a challenge to mold simply for that reason (although maybe he didn’t). Maybe what we should be asking is can O’Brien mold these young men into Penn Staters (in the JayPa sense of the word) without being strict about every little thing?
I think the first obstacle in that is maintaining enough of a focus on the same things Paterno did that people who come here still understand the high standard (and will avoid us if they don’t want it). So far, I’ve not gotten the impression that the standards for behavior have really changed…
BNittsDeMilo - February 22, 2012
I'm not upset at changs so far, but
what role did the stricter rules play in reinforcing discipline and team unity on the path towards molding better men?
The individual rules themselves may be silly and trivial. However when those rules are grouped together to create a package of expectations and standards, they may go a long way towards instilling a sense of pride in what each individual player is doing. That sense of pride can go a long way towards making good things happen.
bconway6 - February 22, 2012
That's something I didn't really consider but is very true.
Look at how many times players mentioned Paterno making sure everyone was 15 minutes early to meetings. When it stands alone it doesn’t seem important, but it’s part of a larger package. After all, Joe did say “If you take care of the little things, the big things will take care of themselves.”
I’m still ok with some of the standards being relaxed, however I still expect players to look respectable all the time, not just in front of cameras.
Succss With Honor Always - February 22, 2012
"Sloppiness
is a disease. Nobody ever built a great organization just worrying about the big things. It’s the little things that give you the edge. If the equipment man in the locker room doesn’t check his equipment properly, the player senses it and the sloppiness gets into his bloodstream and the disease spreads. And the most difficult thing is to find people on every level who understand that and who are completely committed to detail and to standards of excellence."
- you know who…
Smee - February 22, 2012
Go Spider!
cs93 - February 22, 2012
I am happy with the changes
As long as the team stays out of trouble and continues to work hard and work with the community and go to class….etc….etc….etc. I don’t care about he minor changes. I feel it is a give and take situation. If it gets to loose and the teams start to slack off I would like to see BOB put the hammer down and put some restrictions back on. If the team does everything they are should do and more then why not give the freedom.
jetskijoe - February 22, 2012
BO'B doesn't have the stature to have all those rules
Players put it up with it because they were “playing for JOE PATERNO, legendary football coach.” Bill O’Brien has a long way to go before he can be a hard-liner.
WFY - February 22, 2012
Yea. Look at Edsall in MD
Then again, I’m pretty sure he’s just a douchea.
jman07 - February 22, 2012
When Joe started in the 60's...
that was Modus Operandi. Most people “dressed” to travel and be viewed in public. As a student at Penn State in the 60’s, fraternity men wore suits and their dates wore cocktail dresses to football games.
So it was a bit easier for JoePa to continue the tradition. I think suits and ties are a bit too much (after all we lost a great running back’s eligibility over a suit (sarc)), but business casual would be appropriate. I hope that they don’t get to public “viewings” in jeans, flip flops, no socks tee shirts, etc. But this is the 21st century.
PaJoe - February 22, 2012
Business Casual
So suits without ties? Thats my definition, anyways.
psuphysicist - February 22, 2012
I prefer shirt, tie, no jacket
I go to a lot of doctor’s conferences and I’m trying to single-handedly make that the look and overthrow the tyranny of the jacket-no-tie. So far I’m not having much luck.
It bothers me especially to go to a meeting in Florida or DC in summer and see people in suits, especially, three-piece suits. Think of all the energy that could be saved in buildings didn’t have to be air conditioned enough to keep people in three layers of wool cooled off. It’s madness. Why can’t we, as an advanced society, stop it?
To me, suit-no-tie says “I’m a rich guy pretending to be a man of the people.” Like David Cameron.
reedjohnmiller - February 23, 2012
I hate buttoning the top button
I feel much more stuffy and hot wearing just a shirt and tie than I do wearing a shirt and jacket without the top buttoned.
And I used to live in Florida, and incidentally now DC, so I understand where you’re coming from.
psuphysicist - February 23, 2012
Really?
I don’t find that to be the case.
Maybe you need to go up a half size on your shirt collar? Or maybe I need a different kind of jacket.
reedjohnmiller - February 23, 2012
Lived in O-town for 13 years
Went from air-conditioned house to air-conditioned car to air-conditioned office. But I’m with physicist, the tie is what got me. Open collar, no prob. Buttoned collar, heat. So I started wearing pre-underarmour synthetic shirts as undershirts and that took care of 90% of the issue. That and summer-weight wool.
Smee - February 23, 2012
I have a giant neck...
but I’m not that big of a guy (I assume this has to do with a mix of genetics and playing football for 10 years). So if I find a shirt that actually fits my neck, I look like I’m wearing a potato sack.
I think I may make my great contribution to the world a shirt/tie combo that still looks classy but doesn’t strangle you. Once that happens, I’ll actually enjoy dressing up. Most of the materials and things are actually pretty comfortable if you get stuff that fits you.
Sorry reed… until I can get that to catch on, I actively combat you.
BNittsDeMilo - February 23, 2012
You can buy neck extenders
that increase the collar by a half-inch. As the ad says, you can buy a shirt with a 16-inch collar and use this gadget to make it a 16.5 inch collar.
http://www.amazon.com/Wonder-Button-Collar-Expanders-Extender/dp/B0008172YS
And, no, they don’t work elsewhere on the body.
PSU_Lions_84 - February 23, 2012
Speaking from experience?
BNittsDeMilo - February 23, 2012
Only about the neck part, BNitts!
My other comment was a preemptive strike.
PSU_Lions_84 - February 24, 2012
If you aren't talking > 18" neck,
I can recommend JCPenney dress shirts in their “Athletic” cut. I can get shirts with an 18" neck and generous shoulder room without it looking like a tent amidships.
PSUGuru - February 23, 2012
An 18" neck is right on the edge of comfortable for me.
Glad to see I’m not the only misshapen freak around here.
leeharvey418 - February 24, 2012
I wear a 19 or 19 1/2 and 36 pants.
BMAN13 - February 24, 2012
Holy shit this subthread is so helpful
/buys neck extenders
//surfs to jc penneys for athletic cut.
jtothep - February 24, 2012
the neck extenders sound great.
I just prefer not to wear ties. I had shorts on at work yesterday and today.
ooh, funny tangent. I had shorts on a couple weeks ago and a young woman, married to a guy in my section, walked up and said “shorts? its January” now I do know her very well, she comes out to hear me play.
I answered, “there you go, always have to look down there first thing” she shook her head and said she was telling my wife what a dog I am, like that will be the first.
An hour later, our female commander walks by and the first thing she says is “Shorts? its January” I bit my tongue, very hard, smiled and said," yeah, low heating bills are great"
BMAN13 - February 24, 2012
I have an assistant
who wears shorts and sandals throughout almost the entire winter. I think it takes <20 degrees and wind to make him wear shoes. (The shorts don’t change)
PSUGuru - February 24, 2012
I've never seen the problem with that.
Women still wear skirts in the winter time, right? What’s the difference?
jesse. - February 24, 2012
Yeah, but
they cheat and wear pantyhose…
PSUGuru - February 24, 2012
pantyhose does nothing to keep legs warm
literally nothing.
Cari Greene - February 24, 2012
I'll take your word for it.
I don’t think they make a ‘King’ size anyway.
PSUGuru - February 24, 2012
Didn't Joe Namath wear pantyhose
in some of the colder games?
Course, Joe walked to the beat of a different drummer.
PaJoe - February 25, 2012
"I want to kiss you Suzy..."
cs93 - February 25, 2012
Cheat!
cost, ackwardness, shortlife, hand wash, drip dri .. nothing about them
just forget this
ComfortHePuHuTh - February 25, 2012
I'm really like a 19" neck, but I often squeeze into an 18 (by moving the button)
because the shirts fit so much better. I really can’t believe that there’s not enough of a market for 18.5" and 19" shirts that aren’t tents.
I mean, I don’t dress up every day or anything, so I haven’t shopped everywhere, but anywhere I’ve found the right size neck the shirt has just been ridiculous. Seems like a huge jump up in actual shirt size from an 18".
I’ll have to check out the athletic cut. Or really shop around a big and tall. Or just get the damn shirts tailored ($$$$$$$).
BNittsDeMilo - February 24, 2012
Are those JoePa shirts
with the screen printed tie still available?
rahpsu92 - February 24, 2012
I always rock the Don Johnson.
i.e. Jacket with t-shirt. Usually black, as opposed to pink and white, but close enough.
jesse. - February 24, 2012
Start with bottled Water.
Quite simply the single greatest waste of money, energy and natural resources created by man. Possibly the the worst thing ever invented.
jesse. - February 24, 2012
I have long hair and a beard [mot of the time]
And I can understand people’s concern with how the team will be perceived if they have long hair and beards. I see it every time a suit walks by me or interacts with me at my job.
misdreavus79 - February 22, 2012
Get a job, hippie!
WorldBFat - February 22, 2012
FTFY.
Get a
jobhaircut, hippie!PSU_Lions_84 - February 22, 2012
If I could grow a beard
I would. Until that time comes, I have settled for a goatee.
jman07 - February 22, 2012
A real goatee
or a Van Dyke?
Smee - February 22, 2012
Van Dyke
But most people don’t understand what that is if I tell them.
jman07 - February 23, 2012
It's interesting. I usually grow a full beard in the winter.
But if there’s something I have to “look respectable for” like going to do testing at a school or going on a job interview, I go back to a neatly trimmed goattee (me w/o any facial hair has only happened once since my freshman year and I don’t see it happening again).
Personally, I don’t think players have to “look respectable” in order to play football and sound intelligent on TV. But hopefully they still get the picture that people will judge them by their looks and keep things within reason. I imagine if things do not stay within reason that the rules will change. BOB has to know that we are well aware that these players are representatives of our school.
BNittsDeMilo - February 22, 2012
"A little change is refreshing and I think he's done just right."
Some things had to change following JoePa’s tenure and I’m ok with that. I think PSU was way too conservative in some ways especially off the field (I don’t think Facial hair or having a bit of long hair makes discipline any harder..that is a myth).
What I’m not going to be a fan of is if, PSU’s graduation rate and academic success rate among it’s football players falls. I hope BO’B respects and adheres to the strong tradition of academic success.
But being more open, allowing these kids a little bit more room to breath and express themselves; I have no problem with that.
OLDLIONofNYC - February 22, 2012
I'm OK with facial hair and long(ish) hair as long as it is groomed.
And I like some well groomed dreadlocks, although I don’t know why a football player would want to give someone something to grab onto.
Someone touched on it above, but a kid who is willing to cut off his hair to play for PSU shows some character. It may have been Redd who cut off his dreads and said "I wanted to cut them off before Coach told me I had to ". If it was not him, please feel free to correct me, but that was awesome.
Keep the suits and ties. Keep the academic focus. Keep the respectful attitude.
letsgopsu - February 22, 2012
Agreed.
Never understood the Long Hair thing either. I don’t think it should be a personal foul either if a player is tackled by that hair…after all it is he who chooses to wear it that long and expose it
OLDLIONofNYC - February 22, 2012
I think it was Devon Smith
But I agree with you. I actually kinda like the beards.
And I don’t like the porn staches, but they are pretty awesome anyway
Cari Greene - February 22, 2012
Bing Bing!
rahpsu92 - February 22, 2012
The HULLSTACHE!
jman07 - February 23, 2012
This is pretty much my position, as well.
Paige2PSU - February 22, 2012
Agreeable Divas Agree
letsgopsu - February 22, 2012
You are a pack animal.
rahpsu92 - February 22, 2012
You only like long(ish) hair
because of that one pic of Paul Posluszny that gets posted on here by you divas. Be honest!
/cue that picture posted by a BSDiva
jman07 - February 23, 2012
His hair is short here. I don't like him with long hair. Its too AJ Hawkish
and admit it, you guys like this too
letsgopsu - February 23, 2012
agree on the long hair on him
and I must rec every time you post this pic.
Cari Greene - February 23, 2012
its just hotness
letsgopsu - February 23, 2012
I too must rec this picture every time.
And I don’t like him with long hair either.
Paige2PSU - February 23, 2012
You're welcome for giving you the opportunity to post it :)
jman07 - February 23, 2012
I admit it
Shirtless, untanned, PSU all-timer of a linebacker, on a beach with boxers sticking out over the shorts.
Eating potato salad.
Yeah, I like this. Every time.
jtothep - February 23, 2012
Nothing says sexy like potato salad.
Nothing.
leeharvey418 - February 23, 2012
If that picture was a girl eating potato salad...
would you be looking at the potato salad?
Something tells me the BSDivas are not either…
BNittsDeMilo - February 23, 2012
The what?
Paige2PSU - February 23, 2012
exactly my thought!
How many times have we seen this posted, and this is the first I’ve heard of it.
Cari Greene - February 23, 2012
I still get stressed about all the sand getting in his food.
PSUinBOSSton - February 23, 2012
HUGE guffaws at this!
I’m not quite sure why, but fastidiousness has been cracking me up lately.
jtothep - February 24, 2012
Josh Hull, the best PSU porn stache ever!!
OLDLIONofNYC - February 22, 2012
Gotta throw in the old school Tom Bradley
Succss With Honor Always - February 22, 2012
Good one!
OLDLIONofNYC - February 22, 2012
Bradley looks like he's 40 in that photo.
Chris Grovich - February 22, 2012
Porn staches....
Will do that.
OLDLIONofNYC - February 22, 2012
And oddly he must never have aged...
because he still looks 40 to me now.
BNittsDeMilo - February 22, 2012
I think just about everyone in the 70's looked at least 10 years older than their actual age.
icavalera - February 22, 2012
ZORDSTACHE BEATS ALL!
This is the Stache that inspired the men of BSD to “Stache Up”
letsgopsu - February 22, 2012
It did for me
AriesGD - February 22, 2012
What did that look like when it wasn't all curled up?
Gross…..
belbijou - February 23, 2012
you answered your own question.
Cari Greene - February 23, 2012
I doubt this dude
Has had that down in awhile.
AriesGD - February 24, 2012
As long as they're graduating
winning, and generally making OSU look like a bunch of idiots, I don’t care how long their beards and hair are.
LAPSU - February 22, 2012
"A little change is refreshing"
But I was hoping for the “wait and see” option. I’m echoing a lot of the above comments, but as long as we recruit good football players who are good people, good students, and people we can look at as people we are satisfied as representatives of our school, I’m fine with it.
Give me somebody who looks like Julio Jones (damn Scouting Combine ad) and goes to class and is well-spoken over someone who looks like Aaron Rodgers but skips class in favor of PS3 anyday. The rule changes don’t impact me; it’s what people do with them that will.
kflintosh - February 22, 2012
I'm okay with change
Some change is needed, and some change will help benefit the program in the long run. And I don’t give a rats ass if people have hats on indoors or a beard, provided they’re still representing PSU well on and off the field.
HOWEVER.
The first time I see the team come out of the tunnel with diamond-plate pants, and neon winged helmets, and sharkskin jerseys, and glo-in-the-dark numbers, or whatever the f else sissy nonsense Oregon does….
I WILL TEAR BEAVER STADIUM DOWN, AND USE THE RUBBLE TO FURTHER SMASH THE PEOPLE WHO THOUGHT IT WAS A GOOD IDEA.
Trust me on this.
Tailgate Shogun - February 22, 2012
Its all fun and games
until we get a white kid with dreadlocks.
skarocksoi - February 22, 2012
I think BOB should allow the team 1 time per year design a uniform
SweepTheLeg - February 22, 2012
As long
as it’s done with crayons in an art class, sure.
The minute they trot out some shit onto the field? It’s ON.
Tailgate Shogun - February 23, 2012
NO
letsgopsu - February 23, 2012
I'll be right there with you
Except I’ll be doing that the first time I see names on our jerseys
Kyle_Martin - February 23, 2012
Neat, orderly, and unassuming.
Hair. Manner(s). Speech. Uniforms. Gameplan. Too much pizazz is a cover for too little substance. Hair doesn’t have to be high and tight, but no “dandelions gone to seed”. Same for facial hair- neat, trimmed, modest. Let the performance on the field speak for you.
/obligatory ‘get off my lawn ref’
PSUGuru - February 22, 2012
I'm kind of amazed at the dichotomy
On the one hand, people don’t seem to care about the players’ appearance, and on the other hand changing the uniforms will apparently result in Beaver Stadium being torn to the ground. Isn’t the iconic PSU image both its simple uniforms and well groomed young men? That is to say that appearances do matter. What is the difference between a uniform and a player’s personal appearance?
Our uniforms are symbolic of our program and the values for which it stands. How then, are well groomed, upstanding young men not extensions of those uniforms?
I take a lot of pride in watching the young men respond to the media, mostly because they are well spoken, polite, highly articulate and intelligent young men. Their appearance certainly aids tremendously in that perception. Contrast that with interviews of Courtney Upshaw and Trent high on something Richardson. As a college football fan I was embarrassed. If I was an Alabama alumn, I would have been sickened.
I watch college football because it keeps me connected with my alma mater. I love Penn State football because it has always stood for something more than football. We know that our boys will make us proud in life outside of football. And the simple fact of the matter is that the vast majority will end their football careers when they graduate.
I think the biggest problem that I have with it is that anything but extremely subtle individuality has no place on a team. You are part of something bigger than you. Embrace it. Care more about your team than yourself. When you wake up every morning and look in the mirror, you should have a reminder of that. And you should take pride in that appearance, if not for yourself, then for the fact that you are representing your teammates as well.
psuphysicist - February 22, 2012
This is the one thing...
That makes me think this is a big deal. Let’s be honest… some of the athletes we do get do not come in ready to take on the world. We may tend to actually get guys to come here that embraced the whole thing, but most college students are not ready to take on the world, especially people who have always just been taught that their athletic prowess will get them through (I was a TA for a number of football players at Vanderbilt… academically focused as it is, they needed lots of help just keeping everything together).
If you want to succeed in life once your athletics don’t mean anything to a potential employer, you have to have an understanding of the way the rest of the world works. I haven’t met anyone in powerful and high paying positions who have face tattoos, long hair, and gnarly beards. They may exist, particularly among hardworking self-employed people in a field known for not taking itself seriously (e.g., a surfboard maker or a brewer), but they aren’t the rule. Heck, even look at brewers. Sam Calgione of Dogfish Head has this chill vibe to him, but he’s clean cut and articulate. Jim Koch of Sam Adams looks like a freaking banker most times.
BNittsDeMilo - February 23, 2012
Yeah, I rec'd both of you for these sentiments
So far I’m pretty psyched about BOB. Among other things, he’s actually likable, which I had no reason to expect that we’d get.
But I do worry about a change, more in the fanbase, in memory of this point:
jtothep - February 23, 2012
Complementary Hypothetical Discussion
Coach A: Coach BOB The players want to know if they can wear hats in the building and grow beards.
Coach BOB: What? Is that a serious question?
Coach A: Yes.
Coach BOB: Seriously, was that like a rule or something? What the hell do I care if they grow a beard?
Coach A: It’s kind of a longstanding tradition.
Coach BOB: As near as I can tell this team has run 15 different plays in the last 10 years, I think we’ve got badder fish to fry than beards.
Coach A: Still….
Coach BOB: Seriously, we’re still talking about beards? This is asinine, and I worked for Bill Belichik, so I know from controlling. Let’s get to work.
jesse. - February 22, 2012
Oh that’s good.
Governator - February 22, 2012
I would have ended with BOB in an Iverson-esque rant.
“Beards! Beards! We talkin’ bout beards. We ain’t even talking about football. We’re talking about beards!”
Jeff Junstrom - February 22, 2012
Bill Belichik is the epitome of dressing wellSeriously though, he looks like a fucking hobo in that stupid as sweatshirt. You’re fucking professional man, dress like it. I’d be surpised if 1) that sweatshirt was ever washed and 2) he didn’t smell like the back seat of a new york taxi cab that two homeless people had just broken into and had sex in while being driven by the typical BO ridden NY cab driver.
psuphysicist - February 23, 2012
Well
Why don’t you tell us how you really feel.
jman07 - February 23, 2012
That's actually a personal F**k you to the league by Bill.
If you see Bellicheck outside of football, he is actually quite well dressed.
Jeff Junstrom - February 23, 2012
As only a casual NFL fan, I had no idea about this
But that sorta cements the point then, doesn’t it?
psuphysicist - February 23, 2012
I don't know. I kind of agree with his stance in this particular instance.
If the league is going to mandate he wear Reebok brand logo gear when he prefers something else, I don’t have a problem with him saying “Fine, then I’ll make it look hideous.”
Jeff Junstrom - February 23, 2012
Yea. It's ridiculous
The fact that Mike Nolan wasn’t allowed to wear a suit and tie on the sidelines because it wasn’t licensed is pathetic.
jman07 - February 23, 2012
All NFL coaches should wear not only a jacket and tie but...
also a long overcoat and a fedora. That’s how it ought to be.

reedjohnmiller - February 23, 2012
Yes
I love this look
Kyle_Martin - February 23, 2012
I don't disagree, and now that I know I'm partially supportive
I actually have a problem with the NFL mandating what coaches wear. Personally, I think they should be wearing shirts and ties on the sidelines.
The point though is that I had no idea why he chose to wear that ugly sweatshirt, I just assumed he was some slobbish asshole. I can’t imagine that I’m in the minority on this, either.
psuphysicist - February 23, 2012
I should clarify
I support his goal, but his methodology could use some work. Obviously it hasn’t had the desired effect, so maybe its time to go back to the drawing board?
psuphysicist - February 23, 2012
I kind of respect that he didn't make a big deal of it, just the subtle "EFF U"
Joe was kind of good at that too.
letsgopsu - February 23, 2012
Yeah, when I heard that I came way down from my previous hatred of him
My understanding was that he thought coaches should wear suits and ties, or at least be allowed to, but the NFL said he had to wear reebok bullshit. So he said, okay, I’ll wear this ridiculous sweatshirt on TV every week. But that wouldn’t make enough of a statement, so I’ll go ahead and take my team AT LEAST to the playoffs every year, if not the Super Bowl, to prove that I’m the smartest and best coach in the league and still think your reebok contract is stupid.
It’s kind of like Jim McMahon.
PSUCharmas - February 23, 2012
Once I head this story I thought maybe we was a little awesome
But only a little.
Joe Gibbs used to wear a tie. It was weird when he started sporting the official gear.
letsgopsu - February 23, 2012
I saw him at the Alabama coaches clinic last year
I wouldn’t say he was well dressed unless you think Charlie Sheen’s character from 2 and a half men was well dressed.
carolinaeasy - February 23, 2012
,
letsgopsu - February 23, 2012
I respect Bilichek more now
Both for the classy tux and the hot wife
psuphysicist - February 23, 2012
She does not look like a "wife", not that wives cannot be hot. She looks like "arm candy" to me
she showed up on several photos in the GIS. Can you spot the silicone?
letsgopsu - February 23, 2012
Everyone knows Bill Belicick bangs other dudes' wives.
WorldBFat - February 23, 2012
Of course.
He runs a tight ship, fiscally conservative. It’s cheaper that way.
PSUGuru - February 23, 2012
That makes up for the Poz shirtless again.
Pentimental - February 23, 2012
This is speculation
But I have a feeling that the strict appearance guidelines stuck around because Joe wanted PSU to be different. This could make the guys recognize that PSU is not like other schools. You are held to a different standard here. It might seem silly at first, but being different has its allure, even if it means adhering to strict rules. I think it enforces the team concept.
moosepsu - February 22, 2012 via Android app
I don't care.
As was said above, many of our players are tatted up anyhow. Just because they keep their hair/facial hair short doesn’t necessarily make them look more or less clean cut. I think their should be a standard of having hair and beards well-kept (i.e. no Brett Kiesel situations) but otherwise they should be free to wear their how they see fit. Goodness knows they have enough to do as D1 athletes already. So long as our players continue to represent themselves well publicly it’s no matter to me.
I would love for BOB to keep them in suits for gamedays though. Reinforces the idea of the game being a business trip.
Governator - February 22, 2012
Here is something I thought about last night though
If you don’t have a strict no facial hair rule, then whats acceptable or not quickly becomes a very subjective decision. That may lead to a kid feeling singled out because of apparent favoritism (whether it actually exists or not). Banning it altogether is all around easier on the coach, given that the coach cares about a clean cut image.
psuphysicist - February 23, 2012
I welcome a real offensive playbook coupled with a less predictable defense
BOB seems to be keeping to the mantra of success with honor too, and keeping the uni’s the way they are.
I don’t care about facial hair, I’m not a fan of having facial hair personally, but if a kid wants to look like hagrid, then so be it

ICEICETHATGUY13 - February 22, 2012
Do Not Want
letsgopsu - February 22, 2012
So this is what happens when turnstile is allowed to grow a beard...
IcersGuy - February 23, 2012
NOT allowing facial hair/dreads/hats doesn't beget a team full of criminals.
Penn State has proven that crimes can still occur by players not in dreadlocks, and many other programs have shown that players allowed to have dreads can flourish in the classroom.
I hate the offseason.
Jeff Junstrom - February 22, 2012
Right, but it matters about perception
If someone who isn’t a CFB fan sees mugshots of kids wearing doo-rags and dreadlocks the perception will immediately be that the football program only cares about winning and will do whatever it takes to get that done- even if the offense is as simple as peeing behind a dumpster. Like it or not, perception is hugely important in American society and comes with all of the baggage associated with stereotypes that are perpetuated.
psuphysicist - February 23, 2012
I completely agree about perception.
But I can’t name a single other school that requires of its players what was required by Joe (at least as it pertains to hair, hats, etc.). Given that, I also can’t name more than a small few schools that I equate with some sort of criminality when I see them (e.g., 1986 Miami). Northwestern doesn’t have these requirements, that I know of. When I see a picture of Dan Persa in a hat, I don’t think to myself “Hoodlum.”
Now if we’re talking mugshots, well that’s a different story, since if you’re in a mugshot, you’ve been arrested. No matter how you look, you likely aren’t coming across well (unless you’re Nick Nolte).
Jeff Junstrom - February 23, 2012
I agree about Persa and jNW
I really don’t see hats as a problem. Removing them when meeting a lady and indoors are products of a bye-gone era. Although as I said above regarding the facial hair, it may just be easier on the coach. ‘No headwear, period,’ is much easier to enforce than ‘only that hats that are acceptable to me’ because it removes the inherent subjectivity and garaunteed complaints from 18-23 year olds.
The other thing no-hats does, is force you to get out of bed a bit earlier and shower and fix your hair (we’re almost all vain jagoffs in college- and for good reason, girls go to classes too). I can’t tell you how many times I went to 8 am classes freshman year looking like some sort of slobbish jackass wearing my hat and sweatshirt because I couldn’t be bothered to get out of bed 20 minutes earlier. I wasn’t the face of the university, so no one really gave a shit. Though, looking back on it, it bothers me that my laziness caused my complacency
psuphysicist - February 23, 2012
Looking back on it...
I wish it was still acceptable for me to throw on a hat and sweatshirt (as long as I had showered the night before). I don’t like society’s rules, I just abide by them.
BNittsDeMilo - February 23, 2012
Having clean cut kids led by an old school coach legendary for rules and discipline
didn’t stop American society from taking a big shit all over the team, coaches and school this year.
To be honest, I couldn’t care less what “American society” thinks about Penn State or its student athletes. I like the clean cut image and as an alum and ticket holder I guess my opinion should count as much as any other interested party. But as for impressing the masses? Don’t give a shit. Not a one.
PSUCharmas - February 23, 2012
^ This
many, many times over. Let’s set rules for ourselves, not because we think Joe Sixpack (who, incidentally, is sitting on his couch wearing a size “small” mesh jersey stretched over his XXXL gut) cares or not.
Could.not.care.less.about.non-Penn Staters.
PSU_Lions_84 - February 23, 2012
Yes, but
and I’m not accusing you of this, but a lot of that crap about “image,” especially when it comes to things like dreadlocks or cornrows, is just thinly veiled racism.
I recall that Rashard Casey was told by his lawyer to get rid of his corn rows before going to court, so he did. Corn rows are a very old tradition among African Americans and besides, it’s his damn hair, who cares? But the lawyer rightly perceived that others would see him as a “thug” if he kept them. As we know, that whole case was BS and a lot of the things written about him (and never apologized for) were obviously racist.
I don’t think we need to placate those kinds of people.
reedjohnmiller - February 23, 2012
As I hail from a multi-racial family
racism is not the impetus of my opinion. I just don’t like the way the dreads look hanging out of the back of the helmet. As I stated below, it has become so ubiquitous as to be cliché. It will alter the uniformity of the uniforms.
Pentimental - February 23, 2012
I agree with the hanging out of the helmet.
It’s not safe.
It may be cliche but for some guys, like Samoans and certain native groups, it’s important to their culture. Who are we to judge?
reedjohnmiller - February 23, 2012
I don't like either
But I’d be more likely to tolerate Trent Richardson’s hair, which was tied, neat, and not too long compared to AJ Hawk’s or Clay Matthews’ hair. It just looks godawful
psuphysicist - February 23, 2012
Thats valid
But thats because racism exists. Its not right, but thats the way it is. Just because its a figurative load of crap doesn’t mean that it is something that we shouldn’t bother concerning ourselves with. Why give those that are racist (outright or thinly veiled) more ammunition?
psuphysicist - February 23, 2012
But why cater to their tastes?
I’d rather see a guy like Lavar with his massive dreads show that he is educated and articulate and break stereotypes than give the bigots what they want.
reedjohnmiller - February 23, 2012
He looks fine in his dreads
They are well kept and usually tied back. He has found a way to make them look well groomed.
Yeah, I agree, the last sentence of my last post was needless. It isn’t about them. But my overall viewpoint stands that image is something that we should concern ourselves with, mostly for the sake of the kids when they leave college and join the real world.
psuphysicist - February 23, 2012
my grandson thinks dreads can look okay.
BMAN13 - February 23, 2012
so cute!
They work on him. Dreads are like any other hairdo. No matter how long, it can be well groomed and look nice.
letsgopsu - February 23, 2012
my daughter cut them off before he started school
he was 4 in that picture. She didn’t want him to get “labeled” young just because of his looks, something it seems people here are doing. Now he keeps his hair very close cropped.
BMAN13 - February 24, 2012
if the academic
reputation stays up then i don’t mind the shaggier look, kids are in college and for a lot of kids my age that is a big deal and shows you have freedom as a adult. I hope the suit for games stays in place, i had that for soccer at my school. if we start getting recruits that follow the SEC path of holding guns to peoples heads (rolando mcclain) then i think we may need to go back to joes way completely though
ktd5048 - February 22, 2012
Hell
The Blue Band now has a stricter hair/facial hair policy than the football team does. Hair must all fit inside the hat, and absolutely no facial hair other than a mustache that is well groomed and does not protrude beyond the corners of the mouth.
dbl5030 - February 23, 2012
Does that mustache rule apply to the women, too?
I kid, I kid…
icavalera - February 23, 2012
Lol technically, yeah
The ladies bought fake mustaches for the bowl game a couple years ago, and had to trim them down to wear during the last uniformed practice.
dbl5030 - February 23, 2012
They bought them
or just didn’t shave for a couple of days?
jman07 - February 23, 2012
Judging by how many of them ended up on the ground/in the trash after 30 min
I’d sure hope they were fake
dbl5030 - February 23, 2012
mean
I will have you know that I was a band geek in high school and have no hint of a stache.
letsgopsu - February 23, 2012
Sweet. I got a winner I'm marrying
If it makes you feel any better, I was a football/baseball/basketball player in high school and had no hint of a mustache. Although in college I could grow a mean neckbeard. Really made the ladies swoon.
jman07 - February 23, 2012
If this didn't make you feel bad enough,
I met my GF (soon to be fiance) in the band. She’d kick your ass for that, lol.
dbl5030 - February 23, 2012
Ah, memories
The one year I had long hair, had to get it pinned up by some wimmins with bobby-pins (either fellow trumpets or friendly clarinet folks). This was a VERY MASCULINE ACTIVITY, I ASSURE YOU IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS.
Coming from high school in Florida, the mustache was a good way to avoid OH MY GOD THIS IS THE WORST CHAPPING EVER after shaving and being out in the cold.
M1EK - February 23, 2012
My brother in law works in construction
He grows a full beard every winter to keep warm
Also, bobby pins can hurt, can’t they?
letsgopsu - February 23, 2012
So can those metal banded scrunchie things
I used to try to snap them when I’d see one of my friends wearing one on her wrist. They’d yell and tell me that it hurt. So one day I put one on and left her do it to me, upon seeing the welt it left and realized that really does hurt. I no longer did that. Not to mention the hair that they would yank out.
jman07 - February 23, 2012
try waxing something
letsgopsu - February 23, 2012
Can it be on you?
I hear that waxing routine hurts — not into self-inflicted pain.
PSU_Lions_84 - February 23, 2012
I assure you it does hurt... no I don't want to talk about it... yes there were tears involved.
Gave me mad respect for women who wax and made me certain I could never fault a girl for forgoing that nonsense.
BNittsDeMilo - February 23, 2012
Just lie back on the couch, BNitts,
and spill your guts about those repressed memories.
PSU_Lions_84 - February 23, 2012
Oh no... they're not repressed.
That’s the problem!
My girlfriend was like Tom Berenger in Platoon. “Take the pain!”
BNittsDeMilo - February 23, 2012
Ya gotta be harder
than woodpecker lips.
PSU_Lions_84 - February 23, 2012
As tempting as that sounds
40 Year Old Virgin makes me think I’m good. Although I did let my friends hit me with a wiffleball bat in college because I insisted it wouldn’t hurt. It would just sting a little.
jman07 - February 23, 2012
My very first game
I had long, wavy hair. I was planning on just pushing it all under a black beanie, but they failed me for inspection. I had to get it all rubber banded and gelled down by some of the senior ladies. Rubber bands hurt.
dbl5030 - February 23, 2012
Bands are little different
Because the uniforms have to create the image of lines and patterns. That’s lost if there’s something covering the collar or distracting from the uniform.
We had those same rules in high school band.
Especially with the big facemasks the guys wear now, nobody is really going to see the players beards and besides, the image of precise uniformity isn’t so important as it is in marching band.
reedjohnmiller - February 23, 2012
I understand this
which is why you’ve pretty effectively illustrated my point. Bands usually have much tighter policies for the exact reasons you state (as well as simply having a clean-cut look, which is a value that the Blue Band holds strongly). The fact that our football team had stricter policies than the band is entirely unique. It’s weird that the football team now having looser hair policies is newsworthy.
dbl5030 - February 24, 2012
Doesn't allowing long hair
technically change the uniforms? It will certainly change the look of the uniforms. They are called uniforms for a reason. I dislike the look of dreadlocks hanging from the back of a helmet and they have become so ubiquitous as to be ridiculously cliché. I used to have long hair in the 70s and we thought it was cool when the players of that era had hair hanging out of their helmets. Yet, we were all Penn State fans.
We live in a time where men can have almost any hairstyle they want. Anything goes. I work with a guy with blonde dreads. They call him Dashboard Jesus. The clean cut look, suits on the road, and no hats indoors will allow these young men to stand out among the others. The tradition should continue as it is not only iconic but, in light of the current zeitgeist, iconoclastic.
Pentimental - February 23, 2012
Exactly.
SubLime - February 23, 2012
I sort of wonder if BOB is operating under the philosophy...
“I’m going to change some rules to relax a little and allow you guys some freedom. I’m making it the responsibility of each member of this team to understand that you still represent a major face of this University and your appearance, at all times, should reflect that. And I expect that the leaders on this team will not only embody it but help teach the new guys what it means to be a Penn State player. That means you can have facial hair, but it needs to be kept up. You can grow some longer hair, but you better take care of it and make it presentable. Don’t make me be a jerk about making up rules for this stuff or spend time on worrying about this. We have more important things to worry about. Like a B1G championship.”
Then, he can come across as the nice guy and when people mess up, he can be disappointed… rather than point to some broken rule.
I mean, I did a lot of stuff in college just to make sure my Mom wasn’t disappointed, but that didn’t stop me from breaking a lot of rules that authority figures had placed on me.
A different style of management, sure… but potentially pretty effective.
BNittsDeMilo - February 23, 2012
Rec for personal responsibility.
be4time - February 24, 2012
I generally agree with physicist above.
Though I’m not TOO bothered by a shaggier look. It is, however, an erosion of what made Penn State unique. What concerns me is – what’s next? Based on this loosening of the rules, I fully expect Bob to be much less strict than Joe was on players celebrating plays and TDs. I’m sure he’ll be upset if a celebration causes a penalty, but I also don’t expect future players who were never coached by Joe to give Moye’s response to ‘give us your best TD celebration pose’ during a photo shoot – ‘I play for Penn State – we don’t celebrate.’ Based on BOB’s moves, I think that mentality is all but dead within 3-4 years. And that’s really disappointing.
PSUEnrg02 - February 23, 2012
Celebrations are fine...
as long as they involve you celebrating with your team and NOT denigrating the other team.
I think PSU has suffered slightly from being a bit too buttoned up. And, in fact, I think this perfect image we’ve tried to project is just one of the many things that made this JS story all about football, secrecy, and PSU “protecting their image.” I guarantee most people know about PSU’s uniforms and maybe the black shoes. They are iconic. I doubt anyone will even notice most of the rest of it…
BNittsDeMilo - February 23, 2012
I'm ok with some celebrations
As long as it’s respectful of the other team and the fans.
There’s also something to be said for showing actual genuine joy. Why do old people want these young people to be so serious?
One of my favorite recent PSU sports pictures, among many, is the shot of the women’s volleyball team winning their fourth straight title. Katie Slay, who is 6’6", jumped about five feet into the air and the look on her face is priceless. The B1G Ten Football refs would have given her a 15 yard unsportsmanlike penalty (and the FAA may have fined her for being to high in the air). Absurd.
Why would anyone want to squash that kind of youthful emotion? Isn’t that why we care about college sports in the first place?
reedjohnmiller - February 23, 2012
I think there's a difference between a spontaneous show of joy
and something that’s clearly choreographed or intended to draw attention to one’s self. And I think that’s what the unsportsmanlike penalty is supposed to address.
Unfortunately, it’s not necessarily applied that way by the refs.
psu87intn - February 23, 2012
Right
Derek Moye tossing the ball to the ref to keep the game moving was not a choreographed attention grab.
Although, I did like that one where the junior hockey team decided to do an homage to the old EA NHL video games by just standing there and putting their arms in the air.
reedjohnmiller - February 23, 2012
but that's fun
it does not sound like they were taunting the other team in any way
letsgopsu - February 23, 2012
yes, this
and it is pretty easy to spot taunting
letsgopsu - February 23, 2012
I like the no celebrating after a TD thing
it’s a subtle slap in the face to the other team. Like scoring was no big deal.
Kyle_Martin - February 23, 2012
is Tebowing celebrating?
discuss….
letsgopsu - February 23, 2012
I don't think so
But why don’t we call it “Doziering”? ’Cause DJ was doing it way back in 1986/87 (see pic of him after he scored a touchdown in the 1987 championship game.)
Oh, that’s right—we didn’t have this new-fangled internet thing back then, to make it easier for media or “the average Joe” to make a big deal out something that people have been doing for a long time.
If I knew how to insert an image, I’d put one here. Unfortunately, I’m somewhat technically-challenged.
psu87intn - February 23, 2012
Pentimental - February 23, 2012
Thank you
Now how did you do that? I see the image link button, but it asks me for a URL and what if the image is on my computer?
psu87intn - February 23, 2012
You have to find a host for it and upload it.
Try tinypic or image shack?
http://imageshack.us/
http://tinypic.com/
Once you upload it, copy and paste the “direct link” and put that where it asks for a URL. You may have to register with image shack to get the direct link.
Pentimental - February 23, 2012
Pentimental - February 23, 2012
I still remember almost actually vomiting with joy at that moment.
jesse. - February 24, 2012
Pentimental - February 23, 2012
Thanks again!
And now you’re just showing off and rubbing it in. ;-)
My senior year. ’86-87, that is. Was that poster from that year? Looks vaguely familiar.
psu87intn - February 23, 2012
1986 National Championship Poster
http://www.charitysignings.com/product/dj-dozier-tim-johnson-bob-white-manoa-signed-penn-state-1986-poster
I graduated in a NC year, as well. 1983. Looks like I just missed you. I found these looking for Dozier. I thought they were cool.
Pentimental - February 23, 2012
Uh-oh
That was a dangerous site for me to find. I haven’t really kept any memorabilia (other than the Coke bottle referenced below) from that period, but Joe’s passing has made me especially nostalgic.
My bank account does not thank you. ;-)
psu87intn - February 23, 2012
Sorry.
I got several items for my 50th, including a Capaletti-signed helmet. That poster is for charity and from your senior year. Perhaps you can explain to your bank account that you deserve it.
Pentimental - February 23, 2012
Yes, that one wasn't a lot.
I think I could justify it. :-)
psu87intn - February 23, 2012
I have all of those autographs too...
Just not on a poster. I met most of those guys when I was a kid. I have everybody who scored in the game, and Pete Giftopolus. A bunch others too. My parents have the whole team on a ball.
jesse. - February 24, 2012
Pentimental - February 23, 2012
That one I remember!
I moved about 6 months ago and was digging through some boxes I hadn’t opened in a while. Found an (unopened) 10 oz. commemorative Coke bottle from the 1986 national championship game, with “Joe Paterno, 1986 Sports Illustrated Man-of-the-Year” screened on the back.
It now resides with my autographed Joe pic and a Hatch Show Print that the Nashville alumni chapter had made in my office at work.
psu87intn - February 23, 2012
Awesome bottle
The one on this site is from 1982. They want $9.
http://www.sodamuseum.com/Coke/10bottles.html
Here is yours.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/2-COCA-COLA-COLLECTOR-BOTTLES-JOE-PATERNO-PENN-STATE-/280828055955?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item4162a81193#ht_872wt_130
Wow, this guy wants $50 for the bottle you have.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Joe-Paterno-Full-Coke-Bottle-1986-NCAA-Champions-Penn-State-Nittany-Lions-/120850629223?pt=US_NCAA_Fan_Shop&hash=item1c23424267
Pentimental - February 23, 2012
Dude clearly doesn't know market value
if others are going for $9.99.
I didn’t think it was worth a lot—just thought it was cool that I found it, especially since I had forgotten I had it.
psu87intn - February 23, 2012
It only takes one idiot to make a market.
What’s the worst that happens? He relists it in a few days?
I’m sure that’s what the seller is banking on.
Sort of like Nittany Ale bottles going for ridiculous prices. Got a case of them from the brewery a while back. Made tap handles for the PSU guys that I know who own kegerators. Glad I got them when I did.

BNittsDeMilo - February 23, 2012
I have a kegerator!
Pentimental - February 23, 2012
Ummm... email me.
BNittsDeMilo - February 24, 2012
Kind of a funny story related to celebrations
One of my brother’s best friends played for Joe in the mid-90’s. He was a starter on the d-line and when they were playing Minnesota, he got a sack. As he was going to help the quarterback up, the guy started cussing him out, so Todd ended up making a gesture that the ref interpreted as “celebration” and he got a penalty.
As he was headed to the sideline, Joe met him at the hash-mark and started yelling “That’s bush league, Atkins! We don’t do that here!” and went on and on, was pushing him all the way back to the sideline. Evidently it was such a spectacle, ESPN ran a clip of it several times.
At practice the next week, Joe came up to him and said “Hey Atkins, I owe you an apology.” Todd said “What for, coach?” And Joe said, “When we got home from the game, Sue yelled at me for going off on you. And she’s right. I’m sorry.” And Todd said “That’s okay, coach.”
Of course, Todd tells it with Joe’s high-pitched voice at the appropriate times.
Dang—I got teary just typing that story up. Thought I was past that.
psu87intn - February 23, 2012
It IS so dusty in here!
That’s my excuse, and I am sticking with it.
PSU_Lions_84 - February 23, 2012
That or you just got waxed...
BNittsDeMilo - February 23, 2012
Brilliant!
PSU_Lions_84 - February 23, 2012
I'll smash my tv
if I see a player celebrating in the endzone or after a routine play, let alone a big one.
Act like you’ve been there before and plan to be again.
psuphysicist - February 23, 2012
I don't think PSU is really unique in that respect
There was kind of a “high era” of excessive celebration in the 80s, but more and more, I heard people of all persuasions and team affiliations preaching the “act like you’ve been there before.” Also, most of our position coaches are pretty old. I can’t imagine them cottoning to that sort of thing.
I think BOB and the seniors will crack down on that stuff simply because it’s obnoxious and because the B1G refs will penalize a guy for anything, not just because it’s “not the Penn State way.” And if he doesn’t, than it suggests a lack of discipline that will probably manifest itself in a lot of ways that lead to losing and he’ll be gone anyway.
reedjohnmiller - February 23, 2012
I don't view it as 'the' Penn State way
But rather one of the ways Penn State did things. I was brought up with this same philosphy and no one in my family had heard of Penn State, much less Joe Paterno until I enrolled in school at PSU. Its the way my dad was, and the way all of my other little league coaches were.
High fiving your teammates is fine. Celebrating on an individual level is always uncalled for.
psuphysicist - February 23, 2012
I agree
I’m just saying is that while most kids wouldn’t be used to rules on their hair or having to wear a tie, I don’t think it will be nearly as tough of a sell to teach most kids how not to act like a preening jackass after they score. I feel like that message is already prominent in the sports culture these days.
reedjohnmiller - February 23, 2012
Have you seen an nfl game lately?
Unwatchable because of the celebrating IMO.
FB6244 - February 24, 2012
Antonio Brown for the Steelers is the worst.
jesse. - February 24, 2012
I will seriosuly throw up
if PSU players start acting like the rest of the world by celebrating ridiculously.
FB6244 - February 24, 2012
/Occupy end zone
PSU_Lions_84 - February 24, 2012
Not too concerned
BOB understands the important things – academics, discipline, the uniforms and what they represent.
He actually pushed the morning work-outs earlier. I don’t think there was any football or academic reason for pushing it from 6 to 5:30 (or was it 5:30 to 5?). I think that was just about pushing discipline.
I think BOB sees a lot of these rules as actually distracting from the important stuff. I can see it both ways. Sometimes asking kids to keep track of something that’s basically meaningless is a good way to build good habits. But I think these guys already have so many details to keep track of that maybe it’s ok to get rid of the ones that don’t really matter very much.
The ugly sweatshirt aside, the Pats ran a pretty tight ship. Brady always looks very sharp in his post game interviews. I’ve also read that Belichek wears that ugly shirt to protest not being able to wear a jacket and tie. And he can clean up when he wants to.
And in every one of BOB’s public appearances, he’s dressed appropriately for the occasion.
Also, in modern sports, there’s been a shift away from “coat and tie” as the symbol of unity and seriousness to wearing team gear all the time now that the teams have uniform sponsors eager to shower them with free stuff. It’s not as formal, but it’s more practical and it’s more uniform. Note that every guy in those work out videos is wearing the exact same Nike shorts, shirt and socks. That looks good, I think. You didn’t see half the guys wearing their high school sweatshirt or a Steelers shirt or whatever. They looked like a team that is proud to represent PSU.
That’s important. The Pirates, for example, made a big effort with that a few years back in their minor league system. The Spikes, for example, were wearing whatever they felt like during practice, etc, and looked like a beer league team. Now, everything they wear is either Spikes or Pirates and every guy has to wear their pants in the superior old-school high sock look and not the Manny Ramirez pajama look. It hasn’t produced a lot of wins, but I think that sort of attention to detail helps the team play as a team better and gives a better impression to the fans. And the Pirates need all the help they can get.
But the hair and the hats are largely arbitrary. What people of Joe’s generation saw as inappropriate and disrespectful, younger people don’t see that way. It goes both ways anyway. My mom, who is more in line with the old school, actually thinks I cut my hair too short! You can’t win.
It’s not that our generation doesn’t care about presentation. It’s just how standards and conventions change. 100 years ago or so, pink was considered the better color for boys (more powerful and flash, supposedly) whereas blue was for girls. Stuff like this evolves.
(I would like to see PSU ban guys from having hair hanging out of their helmets. I think it’s more dangerous and it kind of looks crap too, but the danger is more important. Actually, I’d like to see the NFL and NCAA ban that too. Getting pulled down by one’s hair would be dangerous, but then if that were banned, guys would just grow it super long to prevent anyone from grabbing the back of their jersey. Just tie it up or cut it off during the season.)
As for the media availability, I think Joe just saw the press as a distraction, and he wasn’t entirely wrong, and I think he had some real animosity for the press, which wasn’t entirely undeserved. In the old days, a coach could get to know a reporter and know that he wasn’t going to write bad stuff or betray confidences. That’s not how it is now, for better and worse, and Joe just didn’t like that shift.
But I think BOB has a better feel for how the media works in this day and age and sees opportunities to use it to his advantage and doesn’t just look upon them as a distraction. His time in the NFL, especially in Boston, probably helped with that.
It’s especially important right now because of the “secrecy” narrative that took hold in the media, which is partially fair and partially unfair. But beyond that – and I think that whole issue will go away in a year or two – it can help in recruiting and can help get skeptical boosters on his side.
Those are the immediate benefits, but “marketing the program” should also be an important long-term goal for PSU (and every football program.) You’d think PSU wouldn’t need to market football, but I don’t think they can ever get complacent about it. Not just because STEP and the economy has made tickets a tougher sell, but because people today, especially kids, have more and more sports and other entertainment options battling for their attention. It’s not a given that every kid in PA is going to always care about football as much as they have before, let alone automatically care about PSU football. If programs like Penn State were to go the route of major league baseball and just think that people will continue to show up forever because they always have in the past, we could see the same kind of gradual decline in interest. Maybe not next year or the year after but five, ten, and 20 years down the road, absolutely. Remember when horse racing and boxing were popular sports? It could happen.
reedjohnmiller - February 23, 2012
Meet the new Oline
psuphysicist - February 24, 2012
they look familiar...somehow...
Cari Greene - February 24, 2012
Alright, somebody explain that.
I’ve seen it here a bunch, and haven’t figured it out yet.
PSU_Lions_84 - February 24, 2012
Can't remember the original designer, for proper credit
But I believe it first appeared circa Sep, 2009, after the Iowa game when Deontae Pannell, among others, was terrorized by Broderick Binns & Adrian Clayborn, among others. Obviously—and hilariously—the implication is that our Oline was so malleable that they practically constituted these five items of ‘deterrence.’
jtothep - February 24, 2012
Thanks for the explanation,
even tho it evokes a sad time.
PSU_Lions_84 - February 25, 2012
This is very fine work
And, I believe, from a poster not traditionally in the image markup game, amiright?
Way to get your Paint on, son!
jtothep - February 24, 2012
Thanks
And yes this is the first photoshop I’ve ever attempted and put out there. Of course, its a photoshop of a photoshop, so I don’t know how much it counts. And I wasn’t a BSDer in 2009, so I don’t know who the original credit goes to.
psuphysicist - February 24, 2012
here is the original, still don't know who was the first to do it
letsgopsu - February 24, 2012
I'll maintain that
They look better in the original. Much more polished and professional.
psuphysicist - February 24, 2012
I know it's sexist,
but I have never liked long hair on a turnstile.
Paige2PSU - February 24, 2012
/spits water
Chris Grovich - February 24, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Black Shoe Diaries to post a comment.